I will never look at Snoopy the same way again. Or Calvin and Hobbes, or even Garfield. They have all been ruined for me. Not ruined, but rather changed. Disfigured, you could say.
During my stint at film school, a screenwriting teacher told us that once you step behind the curtain and know the structure behind the movies, that you never see them the same way again, and you know what? It’s true. (That and the fact that most movies operate on something that you could barely call reality these days.) And with comic strips it’s the same thing, once you put pen to paper and have your own characters, you can’t help but second guess all of your favorite creators, as if you have reinvented the wheel:
“Why is Snoopy hugging Woodstock in the last panel? He should have thrown him into his water dish!”
“Why can’t Calvin’s parents have names? Why doesn’t he have a last name? From now on, in my head they’ll be Dolores and Heathrow Buckhout.”
“Why is Garfield...just...there? Why is there still a Garfield, anyway? Why don’t they put that swell comic about the girl and the sheep in my newspaper?” (Hey, a guy can dream.)
It’s a bit different with superhero comics, since no fan is a real fan if he (or she) isn’t second guessing and complaining about every single creative decision. (Organic webshooters? Are these people stupid?) But once you have your own comic strip, a lot of the enjoyment is gone, even the enjoyment of bad; instead of going: “that’s cool” and “that sucks”, your author mind goes “I would have done that differently” and “Holy Mother of Walt Disney, WHY DIDN’T I THINK OF THAT?”
Luckily, even as an author you can sometimes look at something completely from the reader perspective while barely thinking about how you would do it differently, and why this comic is so good it depresses you to the point you never want to upgrade your photoshop because what’s the point, really? I have a few, Pogo is one, Mafalda is another, and The Perry Bible Fellowship too. (Those white blobish characters are creepishly real.) What are yours?
-adis!
Comments
Re: Authorship killed The Family Circus For Me
It's the same with music to a great degree - if you play a lot of music it gets to a stage where it's really hard to listen to a lot of stuff without automatically hearing each part individually instead of the whole. On the other hand, when you do find stuff which your head doesn't automatically break down into parts it's usually a very good sign and means something new (to you at least) is going on there; also it trains you in different ways of listening, as with concentration you can force yourself to put the parts back together if you really want to and try and listen like a non-musician would. Perhaps similar things apply in terms of comics.
--
http://www.conniptions.org/
--
http://www.conniptions.org/
Re: Authorship killed The Family Circus For Me
Re: Authorship killed The Family Circus For Me
Re: Authorship killed The Family Circus For Me
Re: Authorship killed The Family Circus For Me
I think it's inevitable that, as a creator, you will automatically - even unconsciously - deconstruct works as you read them. I can't even remember when I last read a book (or comic) without thinking "x" was done really well but "y" was done very poorly.
As long as the "things done well" outweigh the "things done poorly" I don't find it necessarily ruins the magic for me. I remember reading Identity Crisis and enjoying it enormously even though I was struck by several gaping plot-holes. The skill in the characterisation and general story-telling was enough to outweigh the flaws.
Conversely, I remember admiring the plotting of The Da Vinci Code but finding it a dreadful book to read, simply because the overall quality of the writing was so mediocre.
In both cases, being able to "see behind the curtain" and appreciate the constituent parts individually didn't affect my overall reaction to the work. It was the balance between those parts.
Broken Voice Comics
Because comics are not just for kids
Post new comment