Variety reported this week that Platinum Studios' comic Cowboys & Aliens is headed for the movies in a deal with DreamWorks and Universal Pictures along with Imagine partners Brian Grazer and Ron Howard. I didn't actually think that the comic of Cowboys & Aliens worked that well (just not a very good story, poor characterization and the wrong tone) but the concept is killer and conceivably in the right hands could be a fun popcorn kind of movie.
It's been awhile since I first wrote about this back in May 2003, and it's no longer such a stretch to imagine a webcomic translated to a movie.
Comments
Isn't Cowboys and Aliens
What came first, the chicken
proud of being multimedia, where they can take one concept, have it online, in book form, they even have some chat program thing with the characters. I think they call it "Full Circle Commercialization". This would be the first real success story for that type of concept through them.
these webcomics online to whole other markets if you have the right connections to do so.
DJ Coffman- cartoonist
yirmumah.net - herobynight.com
I'll be more impressed when
This is what I was trying to say in the first place
When I say you're just not
DJ Coffman- cartoonist
yirmumah.net - herobynight.com
Gimme a break, DJ--The sequel!!!
Ok, I get it. You don't like
DJ Coffman- cartoonist
yirmumah.net - herobynight.com
DJ? If what you got from
Well, I hope whatever is in
DJ Coffman- cartoonist
yirmumah.net - herobynight.com
DJ? I don't have a half
DJ may be very enthusiastic
Platinum is only promoting themselves, sure. But they own a webcomic community, and they're not afraid to say so. Combine that with their efforts to make their comics reach a larger audience and the end result is a larger potential audience for any webcomic. The benefits to other comics may not be earth-shaking or direct, but they exist nonetheless.
Chris Jeffery
_______________
cartridgecomics.com
_______________
Chris Jeffery
Cartridge Comics
Platinum is promoting
I don't know about you, but
DJ Coffman- cartoonist
yirmumah.net - herobynight.com
Is that the hook? That
You Disagree - Let it go
Guys - you disagree.
Everyone can make up their own minds, no need to keep going at each other here...
____
Xaviar Xerexes
On second thought, let's not go to Comixpedia. It is a silly place.
There you go beating me to
There you go beating me to the post button and making me feel bad for adding to this. :p
_______________
Chris Jeffery
Cartridge Comics
_______________
Chris Jeffery
Cartridge Comics
I'm beginning to think you
I'm beginning to think you could really use some time away from the computer. You're all over this page arguing with people, ignoring their points, and barely making any sense at all.
Did you somehow miss the fact that Platinum is making a movie about a comic hosted on Drunk Duck? Regardless of how much it technically qualifies as a webcomic, the point is Platinum is being very vocal about pointing out that they're making a movie out of a webcomic, which will raise awareness of webcomics in general. No, this doesn't mean a savior has come along to send us all oceans of traffic, but it means we've made another small step into mainstream culture. I mean, look what movies like Spider-man and X-men have done for Marvel. While I hardly expect Cowboys and Aliens to be aywhere near that scale, it will still attract attention to the source material, and in turn, its medium.
_______________
Chris Jeffery
Cartridge Comics
_______________
Chris Jeffery
Cartridge Comics
Well, there's already this.
Give me a break, DJ. The
Oops...
First webcomic to make it to the movies?
I would say that Cowboys and Aliens is a webcomic on a technicality. But we really are lacking a decent definition of what the word webcomic really means.
You say webcomic are you talking about the community? Any comic on the web? Only comics that STARTED on the web?
All the syndicates have their newspaper strips online daily. Are those webcomics?
Cowboys and Aliens is an easy pitch to Hollywood. I think the idea would have a good shot as a pitch comic or not. But I know from friends who pitch their comics to hollywood studios and producers all the time.
The word is that it's easier to get something sold if it's ALREADY a comic book first.
Platinum is in the business of making comics to pitch to Hollywood. That's why they purchase properties instead of sharing ownership with creators. That's why they offer retailers free copies of the book and offer to pay retailers to promote the book to readers. It's all about prepping properties for Hollywood.
Comics is small potatoes for these guys. Giving a creator a couple thou for the property is small price to pay.
Well technically they keep
DJ Coffman- cartoonist
yirmumah.net - herobynight.com
What community?
I thought there was no webcomic community...
____
Xaviar Xerexes
On second thought, let's not go to Comixpedia. It is a silly place.
I agree with most of that,
Well, yeah, I just meant
DJ Coffman- cartoonist
yirmumah.net - herobynight.com
Sci-Fi Channelly goodness
Exactly
No offense taken
"I think the last successful
"I think the last successful western was Unforgiven and the last successful alien invasion movie was Independence Day."
2002's SIGNS made $408 million (production budget: $72 million). And (SPOILER WARNING) the aliens were defeated by water.
2003's SCARY MOVIE 3 and 2006's SCARY MOVIE 4 both had satires of alien invasion films as their primary story structure, and they made a combined $398 million (with production budgets of around $40 million each).
And 2005's WAR OF THE WORLDS wasn't a direct remake and was based on a book (much like COWBOYS & ALIENS will be) to begin with, so it definitely counts. It made $591 million (production budget: $132 million).
People clearly love alien invasion movies. Even 1996's MARS ATTACKS! made $101 million in spite of audience-repelling Tim Burton weirdness and being released just months after INDEPENDENCE DAY ($816 million gross, $75 million production cost).
I didn't mention Mars Attack
MARS ATTACKS had a
MARS ATTACKS had a production cost of $70 million and made $101 million, so it grossed $31 million more than it cost. Factoring in the theatrical exhibitors' take, it probably wasn't immediately profitable, but I think it's safe to say that it is by now considering video/DVD sales and cable and broadcast licensing.
Alien invasion films have been extraordinarily successful. Even 1996's THE ARRIVAL starring Charlie Sheen (boy, was 1996 the year of alien invasion movies or what?) made $14 million in its limited theatrical release, on a production budget of only $5 million.
And it might not have had giant spaceships appear over every city in the world, but in my book, the MEN IN BLACK films were alien invasion movies as well.
Mars Attacks grossed $30
When a film makes a profit,
When a film makes a profit, it's not a flop. Most films don't make a profit. Sure, we can look back at MARS ATTACKS and WATERWORLD and call them flops all we like, but the studios wouldn't look at those movies as flops, because they made a profit.
A flop is PLUTO NASH. $100 million budget, $7 million gross. That's a flop. To call MARS ATTACKS and WATERWORLD "flops" when there are movies like PLUTO NASH out there is laughable at best.
Whatever the case, my point still stands that alien invasion movies have an extraordinarily high rate of success.
Westerns, not so much. But westerns with a twist do. See BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN ($14 million production cost, $178 million gross).
I don't think you are correct here.
Were they great investments?
Were they great investments? No, I didn't say they were. They were giant, stupid investments with relatively disappointing returns. But nobody should be investing $200 million into a movie in the first place. That's insanity. The original STAR WARS cost $11 million and it still looks spectacular. That was only thirty years ago. Costs haven't risen THAT much in thirty years. Money is just being spent stupidly today.
I think it's unfair to call a film a flop just because the production budget was insane. When a movie grosses $250 million, that's really good. That's a hit. It may be a hit that the studio should've put a hell of a lot less money into, but it's still a hit.
And PLUTO NASH is still a great big flop and as well as a disaster of an investment (as opposed to a just relatively disappointing investment).
I think Cowboys and Aliens
And that's also the stuff
How could anyone doubt the
Oh wait ... Okay, you may have a point.
Broken Voice Comics
.jpg)
Because comics are not just for kids
WILD WILD WEST made $222
WILD WILD WEST made $222 million. That's pretty darn good for a movie that was almost universally panned. Think of how much it could've made if it had entertaining dialogue, likable characters, and a coherent story!
If they keep the budget down to something reasonable (like the $65 million spent on Frank Miller's 300, as opposed to the $170 million spent on WWW), there's no reason a sci-fi western like COWBOYS & ALIENS couldn't be very profitable. It's got a high concept premise that immediately sounds like a lot of fun and is spelled out right there in the title.
Everybody thought pirate movies were box office poison until Captain Jack Sparrow swaggered in. (And those aren't just pirate movies, they're SCI-FI pirate movies. Well, supernatural pirate movies... close enough.)
And this probably shouldn't
And this probably shouldn't count since it's a sequel, but sci-fi western BACK TO THE FUTURE PART III made $244 million.
It had a production budget of $40 million. Talk about profitable...
It could work
Don't hesitate to procrastinate.
It certainly isn't the first
www.hauntedpixelstudios.com
Post new comment