Is Scott for real?
Submitted by John on December 7, 2005 - 21:16
I can't tell if Scott is satirizing himself or is really pissed off. Is anyone else's sarcasm detector working? I think mine's broken.
- Derek Kirk Kim
- Eric Burns
- Howard Tayler
- Illiad
- Jeph Jacques
- Jerry Holkins
- Joe Zabel
- Joey Manley
- Kris Straub
- Mike Krahulik
- Roger Langridge
- Scott Kuehner
- Scott Kurtz
- Scott McCloud
- Spike
- Penny Arcade
- PvP
- User Friendly
- This Olde Haus
- Array
RE: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Tangent - 12/14/2005 - 20:37
one of us one of us one of us...
RE: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Uncle Ghastly - 12/14/2005 - 21:00
The Knights Templar, under control of the Boy Scouts With the aid of the Servants of C'Thulhu attack to control the Webcomics.
Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by RemusShepherd - 12/15/2005 - 12:25
 ...
RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Uncle Ghastly - 12/15/2005 - 12:49
So lonely *sniff*. So very lonely. :cry:
RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Tangent - 12/15/2005 - 15:54
Hmm. Now I see... I write reviews, not draw fanart. That is why ComicGenesis hates my guts... :D
Well, that and I made a prediction on who I thought would drop out of the 3x Grind. I'll put it past that person though, it's been what, a month? Two months? And no additional drops. Very well done! :)
Re: RE: Re: Routine
by Anonymous - 12/15/2005 - 16:16
[quote:123d5b519d="Airsick_Moth"]Thus it would be silly for me to say that CxN is helping raise webcomic awareness in general. It is raising awareness among people who are already fully aware, because they're the only ones who can follow it. I think webcomics review, especially when it's overly complex, suffers from the same.
I disagree. CxN parodies and satirises webcomics; satire assumes a knowledge of the subject matter it satirises (although, if well done, it is amusing in its own right, as is CxN). Review assumes no prior knowledge, and critique does not necessarily assume prior knowledge either.
I'm the reader who forgot to sign her post before (top of p13), and I am not an expert in webcomics by any stretch of the imagination. I read webcomics review because I don't know about webcomics and wish to know more. I read critiques because I like to think about and analyse the things that I enjoy. Webcomics review is not simply an exercise in navel-gazing or a sermon preached to the choir. A lot of the people in this discussion seem to think that the only ones with real opinions on these matters (or opinions worth hearing) are the comic artists themselves. This is clearly not true - assuming that webcomics are created to be read by more people than their respective artists.
Critical analysis is not something that everyone will enjoy, but that doesn't mean there is no place for it. This is like those arguments in English Literature classes where some of the students feel that literary analysis is pointless or ruins the stories; while others think it is a very worthwhile activity, actively enjoy it and find it enhances the stories for them. Just because you're one of the former doesn't mean that there is no place for the latter and that people should stop analysing what they love. Equally, not everyone should be forced to analyse and critique what they don't wish to (although it's a disadvantage for them, in my opinion, if they never learn to think analytically or in abstract).
If someone thinks analysis should be done in a different way, that's an interesting opinion, and hopefully they'll have some thought-provoking arguments to back it up. But an opinion is not fact (as anyone who attempts analysis should be keenly aware), and should not be treated as such.
--Buzz--
Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by kjc - 12/16/2005 - 00:11
Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Anonymous - 12/16/2005 - 05:36
[quote:bfc30513f1="kjc"][quote:bfc30513f1="RemusShepherd"]This is what always upset me about the 'cool kids' at school. They had no idea how conformist they were. :)
You don't have to have an organized, formal cabal in order to suffer from groupthink. A group mind arises whenever you have a team of people with similar -- not identical, but similar -- goals and methods. I guarantee you Comixpedia has a group mind that is steering the site toward some things and away from others. Note that that's probably a good thing. Better than for the group to be aimless and drifting.
Ha! Hahahahahaha... *snort*
(Detailed refutation deleted for sanity's sake.)
Bite me.
Kelly J.
Now, is that a way to act with your new pinup calendar coming out soon?
Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by RemusShepherd - 12/16/2005 - 11:38
[quote:f549c39744="kjc"][quote:f549c39744="RemusShepherd"]This is what always upset me about the 'cool kids' at school. They had no idea how conformist they were. :)
You don't have to have an organized, formal cabal in order to suffer from groupthink. A group mind arises whenever you have a team of people with similar -- not identical, but similar -- goals and methods. I guarantee you Comixpedia has a group mind that is steering the site toward some things and away from others. Note that that's probably a good thing. Better than for the group to be aimless and drifting.
Ha! Hahahahahaha... *snort*
(Detailed refutation deleted for sanity's sake.)
Bite me.
Kelly J.
That was as reasonable, gentle, and supportive as I could have posted my opinion. Did it deserve a 'bite me'?
I *am* new to the webcomics community, folks. Is *everyone* in it an asshole?
Kelly, I apologize if you took offense at what I posted. It's my opinion, and I think we may need to agree to disagree.
 ...
RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Scott Kurtz - 12/16/2005 - 12:43
All of you webcomics reviewers who believe that one day, academia will review the history of webcomics and that your criticisms will stand out....you're absolutely right.
But mark my words...if you guys keep going the way your're going now. Being pretentious and bitter and angry and self-destructing like William G did on websnark...you're going to make your mark a lot differently than you hope.
Critical review is needed and welcomed. But bitter resentment and anger...a bunch of assholes forming a club to shit on those who have experienced any means of success....a group of people trying to elevate themselves by using analysis of webcomics to make themselves seem more intelligent and superior....that's not welcome.
The drama will always exist. But the drama is very much in the now and it passess. Nobody cares about the drama from years past. What lasts is the work.
Don't let your work be a testiment to bitterness.
RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by spargs - 12/16/2005 - 12:57
I think it's high time for a group hug.
[url=http://www.digi-comic.com][img]http://www.digi-comic.com/images/dcLilLink.gif[/img][/url]
Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Tangent - 12/16/2005 - 13:36
[quote:82aaacb914="Kurtz"]Don't let your work be a testiment to bitterness.
Ironic, as my reviews and criticisms are often considered too "softball" and that I need to review things I dislike so to "warn people of the crap that is out there" and the like.
To be honest... while I have seen some fairly negative reviews out there, the majority of works seem fairly positive. It's just on the forums we tend to snarl at each other, especially when they've had a bad day or feel like they're being persecuted and the like.
*glances up* Hmm. think I did the proper english there. I hate it when people misuse their and they're and the like. :D
Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Scott Kurtz - 12/16/2005 - 13:55
[quote:317e70a5a5="Tangent"][quote:317e70a5a5="Kurtz"]Don't let your work be a testiment to bitterness.
Ironic, as my reviews and criticisms are often considered too "softball" and that I need to review things I dislike so to "warn people of the crap that is out there" and the like.
To be honest... while I have seen some fairly negative reviews out there, the majority of works seem fairly positive. It's just on the forums we tend to snarl at each other, especially when they've had a bad day or feel like they're being persecuted and the like.
*glances up* Hmm. think I did the proper english there. I hate it when people misuse their and they're and the like. :D
And like I said....most of the critical review I read I really enjoy. Even when it's about my work and it's negative. Critical review is valuable. But a lot of people aren't offering critical review.
RE: Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Greg Carter - 12/16/2005 - 14:20
Very well said, Scott.
Oddly enough, there's a bit of indie print comic drama going on in a few places about reviews as well.
If a review of my comic is well thought-out and well written, I don't get upset if it's negative. It's just an opinion and if they went to that much trouble I still appreciate the effort. Sometimes I even agree with them or at least see where they are coming from. On the other hand, if it's done half-assed I just ignore it. no matter how glowing it is. Personal attacks I've ignored completely so far. Since I'm not popular there's only been a couple. Unfortunately some people enjoy being asses.
On this here Intarwub anyone can post anything before they consider what they are actually saying. Or they can spend hours framing just the right amount of jerk-speak. The problem is the post will look the same either way. I don't waste time on motives. If I don't like how someone is talking to me they get ignored.
So with reviews, responses, and pretty much anything you put on the internet, this is great advice: "Don't let your work be a testiment to bitterness."
Did someone say hug? Awwwwwwwwww.
Greg Carter - Abandon: First Vampire - Online Graphic Novel
RE: Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Anonymous - 12/16/2005 - 14:53
Can you not shut up and let things drop?
RE: Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Greg Carter - 12/16/2005 - 15:02
Can you, dearest Hiding Behind Anonymity? That kind of response only provokes people. Shutting up is the best way to end something.
Normally I ignore posts like that but I didn't want to miss my chance to join in the depravity at least once.
Greg Carter - Abandon: First Vampire - Online Graphic Novel
RE: Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Tangent - 12/16/2005 - 15:26
BTW, Greg, I'm curious about something. Is your comic actually coming to an end in a little bit, or is this just the first part of a multi-story series, or something else? Seems rather weird to have one of the heroes about ready to fight the big badguy (or gal) so soon into the series. It's like you're writing a short-story of web-comics instead of the epic novels we tend to see. :)
I've been tempted to review No Frailty, but I'm not exactly sure what I can say, as I'm unsure if the comic is wrapping up or if this is just one part of many.
Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by EricMillikin - 12/16/2005 - 19:59
--------------------------
Fetus-X is the greatest comic in the world.
RE: Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by GregUSA - 12/16/2005 - 20:04
Rob, the answer to that is yes. I have several stories planned, but there's plenty left in this one. Next week begins to bend the plot a little bit.
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Uncle Ghastly - 12/16/2005 - 22:09
[quote:b11782e881="GregC"]
Normally I ignore posts like that but I didn't want to miss my chance to join in the depravity at least once.
Depravity, depravity there's nothing like depravity
I've broken every human law concerning body cavities
With powerful erections or tied to a straight back chair,
A well lubed sheep would be just fine, depravity's not rare.
We could do it in the basement, I could pull you by the hair,
I'll spank you once and once again, depravity with flair.
Who's your daddy T.S. Eliot, who's your daddy?
Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Fabricari - 12/17/2005 - 01:09
[quote:dae19bb6f3="Kurtz"]What lasts is the work.
I just wanted to bump that up again, because them's word's to live by. Now everyone go turn off that intellegence sapping intertron and go draw comics. It's Friday night - if you're spending it reading... forums... you've got... issues.
Shit.
Steve "Fabricari" Harrison
Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by kjc - 12/17/2005 - 01:16
This is how drama happens. Someone writes something and someone else takes offense and airs their offendedness it in an open forum.
Honestly, I shouldn't have replied at all. The fact that I'm replying again is probably just going to continue to fuel the flames.
But you asked a question and I feel obligated to answer.
[quote:49e2033f31="RemusShepherd"]
I *am* new to the webcomics community, folks. Is *everyone* in it an asshole?
Yes.
Actually, everyone in the world is an asshole, sometimes. But, to quote my best friend, "The trick is not going over quota."
Some people go over quota a LOT. Some people almost never. As it happens, I make a serious effort to NOT go over quota, but you pushed a couple of my buttons and, on December 15th, I went over my quota. I apologize.
[quote:49e2033f31="RemusShepherd"]That was as reasonable, gentle, and supportive as I could have posted my opinion. Did it deserve a 'bite me'?
Your kind of comment is the most insidious, in its way, because it seems friendly and light, but you not only implied that we're conformists, but that we ARE trying to guide comics (despite what I said) and that we are helpless in the face of peer pressure.
The words you used have so much baggage on them that they could survive a cruise around the world. "Cool kids" baggage includes associations of being aloof, out of touch, and cruel. Since most of us were nerds back in school, that's a direct insult. A "guarantee" that Comixpedia has a group mind, without knowing us or interacting with us, is a rude assumption. We can and have been a fairly fractious bunch, but part of what I deleted in my original response was that I'm not going to air our dirty laundry to satisfy strangers. The whole idea of a "group mind" rather than a set of unspoken but understood social rules has echoes of authoritarian regime. It also implies that these rules are unexamined and intractable, rather than known, respected, and capable of normal shifting with the cultural mores of the community.
It is true that we are all affected by peer pressure. A significant undercurrent throughout this discussion has been what some peers find acceptable that other peers find unacceptable. It's a big part of the issue I originally sought to address on this thread – that it's difficult to imagine and interact with individual members of groups (like collections of webcomickers, members of a particular portal, staff on a zine, etc.) without ascribing group motives to the actions of an individual. It's difficult but it MUST be done to have intelligent and balanced discourse.
I believe that you cannot paint all webcomickers with the same brush. They do not have the same motivations, inspirations, and aspirations. You can't even really group together genres of comics. Although the gamers are often in synch with each other, they don't all act like children as their stereotype has them behaving. Although many fantasy comics use similar creatures and metaphors, their creators are not all escapists who can't cope with reality and decorate their bedrooms with unicorns and dragons, as their stereotype has them doing. Not all worshippers of irony drink coffee. And not all writers of webcomic criticism do it because we're frustrated comickers or because we're trying to guide comics. Each of us has different motivations, and sometimes the same person has a different motivation depending upon the time of the day and the comic under discussion.
But your post doesn't address what we try to do with regard to fighting peer pressure, to shifting expectations so that stereotypes are not the only thing you read at our zine. It does not address the pains of coming to compromises between us on staff regarding what topics to try and cover. It doesn't look at the practicality of how sometimes we publish what we get, because we didn't get anything else and there's no time to write something up ourselves. It doesn't cover how HARD it is to do this for no pay and no recognition (do you really think I would have ended up on Straub's calendar if I hadn't posted to this thread?). And it doesn't even hint at how frustrating it is to be criticized on a large scale and not be able to refute any of it because it will only lead to drama.
So I made a flippant response to what I perceived to be an uninformed comment and I went over my quota for the day. I'll try to do better in the future.
But you did spell "independent" wrong which is clearly unforgivable.
Kelly J.
by Anonymous - 12/17/2005 - 03:27
From page #2 of this thread.
[quote:bad356d2dc="Furtado"]In case this turns into another webcomic drama...I'd like to have my previous post on this thread stricken from the record. I thought this thread had taken a comical turn, (Thank you for that, Mr. Ghastly.)
:lol:
The biggest laugh I've had all week is coming back to this thread and realizing that it's at 170+ posts. You guys are killing me! Don't stop! Don't stop! :roll:
by apfurtado - 12/17/2005 - 03:29
The above comment was by me. I thought I was logged in. Curse my metal limbs!
by Joe Zabel - 12/17/2005 - 09:24
"Actually, everyone in the world is an asshole, sometimes. But, to quote my best friend, "The trick is not going over quota."
I think Kelly made a very in†elligent and insightful assessment of the situation. Let me just add that it seems there's something about the internet and message boards that drives people to extremes. Maybe it would be a good idea if everybody on both sides of these arguments tried to be a little more forgiving and a little more tolerant.
RE: Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Anonymous - 12/17/2005 - 12:17
Now Scott, I admit my fault, and I fully accept the derision/ anger for the "blowjob" crack over on Websnark. I made my apologies, and I'm taking my lumps for it... Now if only my lumps wern't stemming from unrelated matters, but that's neither here nor there.
But I gotta say, you opportunistically taking advantage of the embarassment of it all to try and make nonexistant links between that and webcomic critics in order to... well, I don't know what your motivation was since the discussion was pretty much over. A parting shot/ attempt to walk away from this thread the winner, or whatever... is pretty sleazy of you.
You know, anything that comes from you about hating the drama sounds more and more like a lie each time you toss some more kindling on the fires like this.
Sleep well tonight, Scott. I know always do.
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by GregUSA - 12/17/2005 - 14:20
[quote:55a795c31b="Ghastly"]Who's your daddy T.S. Eliot, who's your daddy?
That's fucking brilliant. I want to use that poem as my new Mission Statement.
Attention: Bikini girls for Tony Furtado
by EricMillikin - 12/17/2005 - 15:10
[quote:fbb791cb8f="Furtado"]The above comment was by me. I thought I was logged in. Curse my metal limbs!
Hey Tony, I didn't realize you'd posted on this thread -- welcome to my club of complete assholes who I wish would just die already!
My e-mail is totally fucked right now, so besides using this thread to further beat to death my stance that Ghastly and William G are both hurting comics, I'm going to post my work-in-progress sketch for your book to see whether you dig at and if so ask you what the final dimensions and dpi are supposed to be for the book. I've got them in my e-mail somewhere, but my e-mail is being totally fucking stupid right now. Just like Ghastly and William G ALWAYS ARE BITCHES. And so are Joey and T.S. Eliot.
Also, I'm going to take the extreme position that whoever broke my e-mail should not gain god-like immortality but should instead die die die someday.
--------------------------
Fetus-X is the greatest comic in the world.
RE: Attention: Bikini girls for Tony Furtado
by Tangent - 12/17/2005 - 15:13
So why not just PM this image to him?
Not that I'm complaining that much, it's rather interesting. ;)
RE: Attention: Bikini girls for Tony Furtado
by Uncle Ghastly - 12/17/2005 - 15:48
I'm hurting comics?
Well... okay... I'll admit it. I've got a big box of comics from the 80s and 70s sitting down here in my basement and... they're not in archival bags with acid-free cardstock boards behind them.
I know. I know. I'm hurting them but I just don't care. The way I see it is there's nothing I can do to hurt those Alpha Flight comics more than Bill Mantlo did.
RE: Attention: Bikini girls for Tony Furtado
by Tangent - 12/17/2005 - 16:24
Damn, you too, Ghasty? I've ten or so boxes filled with comic books, just sitting there, not in bags. Some of which I actually purchased as archival comics (in bags) and removed from those precious bags to... READ THEM!!! Oh the horror of it all... I'm such a horrible person, and have done so much damage to comics...
I suppose I shouldn't mention the comics which had the covers rip off? ;)
RE: Attention: Bikini girls for Tony Furtado
by Uncle Ghastly - 12/17/2005 - 17:52
Well how the hell else are you gonna get those sweet, sweet, Sea Monkeys if you don't cut the back cover?
by Joe Zabel - 12/17/2005 - 18:31
Well, Tony has already seen this, but if Eric is going to be a show-off, I can be too. This piece for the Tween book would have been a lot better if I'd spent more time on it-- but I was too busy hurting comics!
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Scott Kurtz - 12/17/2005 - 18:44
[quote:8bc4e875fa="Bad Bad William G"]
Now Scott, I admit my fault, and I fully accept the derision/ anger for the "blowjob" crack over on Websnark. I made my apologies, and I'm taking my lumps for it... Now if only my lumps wern't stemming from unrelated matters, but that's neither here nor there.
But I gotta say, you opportunistically taking advantage of the embarassment of it all to try and make nonexistant links between that and webcomic critics in order to... well, I don't know what your motivation was since the discussion was pretty much over. A parting shot/ attempt to walk away from this thread the winner, or whatever... is pretty sleazy of you.
You know, anything that comes from you about hating the drama sounds more and more like a lie each time you toss some more kindling on the fires like this.
Sleep well tonight, Scott. I know always do.
Didn't you quit the internet?
by apfurtado - 12/17/2005 - 19:14
Eric,
You slay me, man! That's one sweet pic!
DPI 300
Dimensions...nothing exceeding 8.5x11. I can always size it down, brother.
Joe, I can never tire at looking at that. Maybe folks will be taking Tween in to the porceline reading room for more than just the obvious!
er....to stay on topic....um....
yeah...what you guys said.
:D
Sorry. :oops:
by Uncle Ghastly - 12/17/2005 - 19:21
[quote:9d9a1e040e="joezabel"]Well, Tony has already seen this, but if Eric is going to be a show-off, I can be too. This piece for the Tween book would have been a lot better if I'd spent more time on it-- but I was too busy hurting comics!
Man... does that ever make my C64's graphics look lame.
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by William_G - 12/17/2005 - 22:53
[quote:ffe49fb148="Kurtz"]Didn't you quit the internet?
I guess you slept well, then.
Re: Attention: Bikini girls for Tony Furtado
by Eric Burns - 12/18/2005 - 00:00
[quote:3fb5107cff="EricMillikin"]Just like Ghastly and William G ALWAYS ARE BITCHES. And so are Joey and T.S. Eliot.
Mother fucking T.S. Eliot!
Good art, though.
by Eric Burns - 12/18/2005 - 00:09
[quote:236c474380="joezabel"]Let me just add that it seems there's something about the internet and message boards that drives people to extremes.
It's a video game.
Seriously. I work with kids. Kids who use school systems. Kids we have to turn into good citizens. And they sit and look at forums and conferences and the like, and it feels like they're playing a video game.
One of our best teaching tools is making them sit in a room with myself, the Dean of Students, and a teacher or two and asking them to read their posts out loud. It makes it real to them. It makes them realize that yes, there are real human beings on the other end of the magical text-boxes.
Sadly, our Dean of Students doesn't have the time to perform this service across the nations of the world.
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: kjc falls victim to webcomics hive mind
by Scott Kurtz - 12/18/2005 - 00:11
[quote:e45328794b="William_G"][quote:e45328794b="Kurtz"]Didn't you quit the internet?
I guess you slept well, then.
Hey fuckhead. Who are you to say which charities are better than others? And who are you to question people's motives for giving to charity? And who are you to question people's motives for fundraising? And who are you to turn off comments like a bitch when people disagree with you?
I guess you're William G.
Scott keeps feeding the monster.
by Anonymous - 12/18/2005 - 00:28
[quote:8494e92ea0="Kurtz"][quote:8494e92ea0="William_G"][quote:8494e92ea0="Kurtz"]Didn't you quit the internet?
I guess you slept well, then.
Hey fuckhead. Who are you to say which charities are better than others? And who are you to question people's motives for giving to charity? And who are you to question people's motives for fundraising? And who are you to turn off comments like a bitch when people disagree with you?
I guess you're William G.
Scott. Seriously. Why do you let him get under your skin? Why do you keep feeding this? I think you enjoy it. I'm lookin at your blog right now, and your trying to stir up more shit with Buckley?
RE: Scott keeps feeding the monster.
by Scott Kurtz - 12/18/2005 - 00:40
I'll stop if you want.
The buckley thing on my site isn't me stirring up shit. It's me cleaning up a mess he made. He just pissed off 500 of his fans and I just gave them a new forum-home. What's the problem.
RE: Scott keeps feeding the monster.
by Tangent - 12/18/2005 - 01:35
Scott? Chill, please.
I mean, was what he said just then truly that offensive? Just ignore it.
Loved the 5-minute break PvP btw. Though was it just me or did that strip sneak onto the scene? I read daily, and I somehow missed that one initially. *shrug* Probably just missed it the first time through.
Re: RE: Scott keeps feeding the monster.
by Scott Kurtz - 12/18/2005 - 01:39
[quote:8f337323cb="Tangent"]Scott? Chill, please.
I mean, was what he said truly that offensive? Just ignore it.
Loved the 5-minute break PvP btw. Though was it just me or did that strip sneak onto the scene? I read daily, and I somehow missed that one initially. *shrug* Probably just missed it the first time through.
Thanks.
What happened was this: the day that strip was supposed to go up, my monitor blinked out dead. So I couldn't use the comptuer at all as I don't have a spare one.
So the next day, I posted it and the current strip. So it was never on the main page, only in the archives. Since it was a day late.
kinda stinks because I don't think as many people saw it.
by Joe Zabel - 12/18/2005 - 01:41
"Hey Fuckhead..."
Speaking of evil, I guess we should take a little drama break to admire another one of my fabulous images, this one from an upcoming project. Any guesses who this is?
by Eric Burns - 12/18/2005 - 01:42
[quote:125b63c289="joezabel"]"Hey Fuckhead..."
Speaking of evil, I guess we should take a little drama break to admire another one of my fabulous images, this one from an upcoming project. Any guesses who this is?
Holy crap!
Is that fan art, or are you working with her on it?
Re: RE: Scott keeps feeding the monster.
by Eric Burns - 12/18/2005 - 01:43
[quote:242b8c9d9b="Kurtz"]So the next day, I posted it and the current strip. So it was never on the main page, only in the archives. Since it was a day late.
kinda stinks because I don't think as many people saw it.
I think a lot of people clicked back to see it, because we went right into the dressing down.
By the by? The "holiday gesture" strip is being linked to all over Livejournal.
RE: Re: RE: Scott keeps feeding the monster.
by Joe Zabel - 12/18/2005 - 02:02
"Is that fan art, or are you working with her on it?"
I'm working from a script by the best damned writer in webcomics, period. And he's gonna have my head on a post if I don't get it done, too!
RE: Re: RE: Scott keeps feeding the monster.
by John - 12/18/2005 - 02:27
Err.... whose it suppose to be? (I likely don't read the strip, but I'm still curious ;)).
RE: Re: RE: Scott keeps feeding the monster.
by Anonymous - 12/18/2005 - 03:35
Helen Narbon, from Narbonic. Looks great! Although scary.
Maritza
CRFH.net