CBLDF: "When Judge Larry Salmon entered the courtroom shortly after 9 AM Monday, prosecutors declared the case nolle prosse, meaning that the charges that were to go to trial this week have been dismissed. Prosecutors are re-filing under a new accusation alleging that Lee handed Alternative Comics #2 to a six-year-old minor and his nine-year-old brother, instead of solely to the nine-year-old, as has been previously, and repeatedly, declared.
Lee now faces two misdemeanor counts of 'Distribution of Materials Harmful to a Minor' (OCGA 16-12-103). One count alleges he 'did unlawfully … knowingly furnish and disseminate to a minor… a book, pamphlet, magazine and printed matter containing pictures, drawings and visual representation and images of a person or portion of the human body which depict sexually explicit nudity, sexual conduct, and sadomasochistic abuse and which is harmful to minors…' The second count alleges that he disseminated and furnished material containing 'explicit and detailed verbal descriptions and narrative accounting of sexual excitement, sexual conduct, and sadomasochistic abuse and which taken as a whole is harmful to minors.'"
The comic at the center of this is a print version of Nick Bertozzi's The Salon, which was originally published -- and is still available -- as a webcomic on serializer.net. Nick is a Harvey and Ignatz award winner, and an Eisner Award nominee. My standards may be different then the average prosecutor from Georgia, but I don't recall anything that fits my idea of "sadomasochistic abuse" in The Salon.
The wonderful CBLDF has already spent $50,000 fighting this case, and could always use your extra cash ...
Comments
Yeah, see...
This is such an abuse of the law. There's nothing sexually explicit, the nudity is clearly not salacious in any way, nor was there ever any accusation of it being knowingly distributed to the child. He had no reason to believe he was handing anything dangerous to a kid, and honestly why were the kids unsupervised at a Halloween promotion anyhow, where were the parents to make sure the kids weren't taking anything dangerous from strangers?
Meh. Hate hate hate the prosecutors. :( They're switching this to get even more people even more upset, too. Nine year old with naughty comics, bad. Six year old, horrifying, right? Ugh.
Sex is more horrifying than
Sex is more horrifying than violence?
What kind of twisted moral is that?
Moral?
I'd prefer not to get into politics, or religion... But I've got to do it in this case.
I've realized that both here in Europe and in the US, there's a number of people who claim we'd get back into our Christian roots. In other words, they think our western world is rapidly decaying because we're being way too liberal -homosexual marriage, decaying influence of churches on the population, etc-. Apparently, sexual liberty is one of the factors on this moral decadence, so they do their best to censor 'sexual depictions' whenever they have the chance. Violence, however, is mostly accepted as long as the 'good one' wins.
One's got to wonder, though, the real meaning of those 'Christian roots'. I've been educated on a Catholic environment, and after that I did research on myself, and have found that most of what they consider to be authentically 'christian' is a series of dogmas, things you've GOT to believe, that were agreed upon centuries after Christ's death and configured churches -Catholic, Anglican, Lutheran, etc- as we know them nowadays.
The real message of Christ, that as far as I can understand, was "Love and care each other as I have loved you", has been buried in centuries of bureaucracy, that started as soon as Christianism was strong enough to become the Roman empire's official religion, and Christ's name has been manipulated by bazillions of interests, personal and political, not always as clear and pure as one would suppose from such a source.
This is one of such cases. As far as I can tell, Christ never said, "Thou shalt not draw naked people in thy comics".
Who knows?
Who knows? He may even have drawn a few of his own. And wouldn't that be the archaeological find of the century!?
More seriously, this whole case smacks of victimisation. You'd think if a whole case is dismissed for being groundless, the prosecutors would realise they're pursuing a cause which the majority of people don't agree with. For them to respond the way they have just has "desperate face-saving attempt" written all over it. Let's hope the new charges are dismissed in short order too. Then maybe they'll start to get the message.
______________________________
Broken Voice Comics
Because comics are not just for kids
Website: www.brokenvoice.co.uk
Contact: edit_bvc@yahoo.co.uk
Broken Voice Comics
![]()
Because comics are not just for kids